Wednesday, 17 September 2014

qPCR quantification using our new Agilent Bravo robot

We have an exciting new instrument in the Genomics Core which will enable us to automate several of our protocols which until now have been quite labour intensive. This is the Bravo Robot by Agilent. After some previous experience with automation, I think that the results we have seen up until now are really quite promising with the aim of saving hands on time and providing consistency and accuracy within protocols.

qPCR test run - One of the first tests we ran upon installation of the Bravo was qPCR quantification. We quantify all libraries which are submitted to our sequencing service so we can aim to generate cluster densities on the flowcell which will yield large amounts of high quality data.

For this test, a single RNA-seq library was quantified using our standard method with the Illumina quantification kit by Kappa Biosystems. To test the reproducibility of the robot, we performed qPCR on this one sample 24 times as this is the maximum number of tubes which can be loaded per run.

In addition to this, each of the same 24 aliquots of this one library was set up in the same way but manually. This test was useful to determine how good the liquid handling on the Bravo is by looking at the reproducibility of the 24 replicates but additionally for comparing that between manual versus automated set up. The library had also been quantified previously so we expected the concentration to be 50nM.
Agilent Bravo Robot

The results show that there is higher variation in concentrations achieved manually although both methods slightly overestimated the expected concentration of 50nM. We saw an average concentration of 55.6nM manually (an 11% increase from 50nM) in comparison to a concentration of 52.7nM (a 5.5% increase from 50nM) on the Bravo.
Despite there being an about 1.8% difference between the average concentrations seen on the manual set-up in comparison to that of the automated, we can see that the Bravo has yielded more consistant results which is what we would expect and also good news. Since this test, we are now quantifying all SLX library submissions using the Bravo.

Although the robot will not be for general use and we will be unable to run individuals qPCR, we will be using it for all qPCR quantification for libraries submitted to us for our NGS service and for generating RNA-seq libraries. Once these protocols become robust within our lab, we will explore the option of utilising the robot in other protocols including Exome libary prep. It is additionally going to be used for automation of ChIP by the Odom group.


  1. How long does it take to run a program for 24 samples? Is it one program for all steps from tube to dilutions to final plate with master mix? This robot looks like something we would be interested in. Thank you for sharing your findings.

  2. Hi, the script is one program for all steps from the tube to the 384 well plate and takes about 20 minutes per 8 samples. The script was written to follow how we usually set up manually so the time could differ depending on how you set up your dilutions.

  3. Obestatin (human) is a hormone that is produced in specialized epithelial cells of the stomach and small intestine of several mammals including humans. Obestatin was originally identified as an anorectic peptide, but its effect on food intake remains controversial.

  4. Antibody Cell Lines,Creative Biogene’s gene editing CHO-K1 cells can save your precious time and effort with great performance in antibody production.

  5. Calcein Cell Viability Assay Non-fluorescent calcein AM is hydrolyzed by intracellular esterases into the green fluorescent dye calcein, which can be used to quantify the number of viable cells.